Play testing my Campaign

How I play test my D20 based campaigns and adventures is something you probably wonder if you’ve ever heard me talk about it. It’s pretty easy. It is also a vital thing to do because of the way I tend to design dungeons/encounters/scenarios, which can be brutal sometimes. Without the testing I can’t really tell if a scenario is too difficult for players and because it is a heavily stat based combat system, it’s harder to do the DM fudge here and there to ensure the players aren’t being brutally overwhelmed. So here’s my way of testing the scenario out in order to make sure it is possibly survivable.

I start out with a generic set of “Player Characters.” These are 3-6 generic PC builds for important party rules built using the same rules as what I expect the players will have and appropriately leveled/geared. There’s nothing spectacular about any of them, they’re what you expect from a generic adventuring party using only the core rules. I don’t have anything weird in here nor do I have the broken combos that one might expect a player to make.

This group can be adapted to generic versions of what the players are running so that I can get a better feel for how the particular group is going to fair against the scenario.

Now that’s all well and good, but we’re talking about a game that involves dice, which means of course that luck can be fickle and cruel. So depending on the challenge I want to give I use 3 die values for determining the challenge level. Those numbers are 5, 10, and 15. The number chosen as the representative of a die roll depends upon how much of a challenge I want a particular thing to be.

When you get into combat though you can’t just select things like that arbitrarily though. There is far more going on than is possible to conclude with only those 3 numbers. So I rotate each character through a cycle of those numbers with every 20 th “roll” designated as a critical success or failure (determined by flipping a coin). Damage is determined with the half die value method I learned to use when playing Warmachine/Hordes. Each die is going to roll an average equal to one half of its highest number plus 0.5. So a D6 is worth 3.5 damage while a D12 is worth 6.5. For odd numbers of dice, say 3D6, you round down to the nearest whole number, because your dice will always screw you more than help you. So 3D6 = 10.5, rounded down to 10.

It gives the combat a sense of randomness and helps to make sure that it isn’t too easy or too hard. So when I say I’m playtesting my campaign and tweaking it, this is what I’m doing. It is typically an exercise performed entirely on paper. This enables me to not have to worry about figures being moved by children or animals and goes much quicker.

Which reminds me that I really need to go through this stuff again as soon as I finalize my latest system tweaks. Some of these modules I’ve designed haven’t been tested since I started tweaking the way magic works, that could be bad…

When I say I’m running the numbers on something, this is also how I’m typically going to do it. While working on the cannons and ships I’m running these types of numbers through my head with generic assumptions along each phase of development. Right now I’m working on damage scaling vs hull section Hit Points/Hardness. So a Pinnace, a small sailing ship, has 4 hull sections and sinks when a single section is destroyed. Each section has 5 inch thick wood which gives it a Hardness of 5 and 50 HP (10 HP/inch of thickness). A single Demi-Culverin, a type of medium cannon, does 4D10 damage. At a value of 5.5 damage per die it is dealing 22 points of damage (17 after hardness is applied) per hit.

That means that it will take about 3 hits on average from one of these types of cannons in order to sink one of these small ships (51 points of damage after Hardness). Is that about right?I’m not quite sure yet because I haven’t finished coming up with stats on other ships yet, but this struggle is another story for another blog post.

Oh man, converting real world ships into D20 system ships is bringing up a whole new host of problems and is a wonderful challenge. This is gonna be a lot more effort than I originally thought. Ever try to figure out how to make a 50+ cannon broadside against a ship that has 337 hull sections (destroy 84 to sink it, each section has 240 HP) work with the narrative naval combat rules and not make you insane while trying to keep track of each shot? (By the way, it’s the HMS Victory I’m converting as an example, this example is all based off of real world statistics. The freaking thing is a 104+ gun, triple decked ship designed with a crew of 850+ people on board.)

Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy and gaming

I recently finished watching the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy and its attempt to launch a sequel trilogy based off of the book On Stranger Tides. The movie series has always struck me as an odd one for Disney to do because it was truly so much grittier than most of the things you’d expect to be put out by them. 

I’m glad they did, because it really brought fantasy piracy back into mainstream thought. Which depending on who you ask may or may not be a good thing. (Oh, by the way, since these movies are so “old” and popular, I’m not going to worry about putting in spoilers warnings. If you haven’t seen them and don’t want them spoiled, don’t read this post)

The movie series at least showed that a well done movie about pirates could be done and actually do well at the box office. It might be the exception to the rule though because of the unique niche the first movie filled when it came out.

The first movie is without a doubt the best one. We all know, and quite possibly love it. The movie was original, well paced, well acted, well directed, well scored, easily quoted, and was full of fun, adventure and excitement. The special effects were very well done at the time and helped immerse you in the world they had created. 

It was quite possibly a perfect example of how well any potential fantasy series could be done if given a large budget and a good casting department (side note: after reading the nightmares that took place behind the scenes on this movie via IMDB, it could have been quite easily an awful movie and a massive box office disaster).

The second movie isn’t as good as the first one, but it’s still a very enjoyable movie with good casting with an enjoyable and unique story. There are some parts that are just too silly that break the pacing and mood but they don’t ruin it. Keira Knightley’s character Elizabeth Swan is insufferable and annoying to me, too much of the clichéd Warrior Princess with modern values thing going on there, it’s one of my pet peeves so maybe it didn’t bother too many other people. 

Some of the action scenes go out of their way to be over-the-top affairs (Water wheel I’m looking at you) and somewhat detract from the mood, but despite all of this it left you wanting more at the end when it leaves off with the cliffhanger ending. This wasn’t a masterpiece movie by any means, but that didn’t mean it wasn’t fun to watch. It served the purpose of entertaining me and was worth my time and money.

Did it bother anyone else that in the second and third movies the nameless crew members should have been wearing Star Trek: TOS style red shirts with how guaranteed they were to die?

The third movie is a different story though. Clocking in at 2 hours and 49 minutes long, you expect this movie to be an epic and potentially satisfying conclusion to the trilogy. Unfortunately it wasn’t. Between random bits of goofiness (which reek of Disney suits getting involved in the process) and an apparent literal interpretation of fan cries for “more Jack Sparrow!!!” you get a movie that has a good story with tons of potential getting bogged down by a colossal amount of stupidity and unnecessary scenes. There is at least 30 minutes you can just throw away from this movie and not feel bad about it. (Actually I would love to see someone I know who is good at editing remove that footage so we can see what it could have been.) 

Remove all of the scenes of Jack talking with himself and various scenes of stupid and yu have yourself a movie at just over 2 hours in length that is actually something worth watching. Seriously, take away the scenes with multiple Jack Sparrows and the various other scenes that are just all kinds of stupid and you have a movie that could have been great. The concept and scripting outside of that half hour were solid and enjoyable. 

Think about the early part of the movie where they go to Davy Jones’ Locker to find Jack. You end up with a 10+ minute scene where nothing important or even interesting happens. You just get to see a bunch of Johnny Depp playing a crews worth of Jack Sparrows and playing around with a rock crab (which I will admit was a pretty neat visual effect). 

Following this scene you cut to the crew fresh from crashing down into the Locker showing up on the beach getting ready to track down Jack, who they have no idea where he is or what he’s doing. Suddenly he comes crashing over the sand dunes sailing on the sand using the rock crabs. It’s a very interesting scene, but totally expected and unsatisfying because of the 10 minutes we sat there watching nothing but Jack on screen. It ruined a scene with potential mystery and visual impact with a worthless scene that bored you out of your mind so by the time the scene rolls around you don’t even care anymore. 

Pretty much any scene where Jack is alone and talking to himself needed to be removed and hidden in a deep dark pit. There are better ways to go about what they were going for, and I’m convinced the director took “suggestions” from Disney suits literally just to be a defiant ass.

The fourth movie is interesting. From what I can gather, they took at least part of the script for the book On Stranger Tides and shoehorned a few PotC characters into it. I’m not sure how I feel about it. I think I can understand why it was done (money and brand recognition), but it doesn’t quite feel right. I never read the book (I really should from what I hear, it’s supposed to be brilliant) but it just seems like Sparrow, Barbosa, and Mr. Gibbs weren’t part of the same world as everyone else. 

Like the events were happening around them regardless of what they did or how they were involved. Just like the third movie there was some great potential in this story and setting but it got wasted by silly/stupid/out of place scenes and characters. The casting and acting were well picked. The characters were believable. The setting was entertaining and interesting. The plot was interesting and enjoyable. There were just some terrible decisions made based upon forcing the PotC characters into it. (Still irritated by that coconuts scene…)

I like the action and setting of the series. It really was the inspiration for what I’ve designed my campaign setting around. I’ve always wanted to play an RPG where it’s high seas adventuring and swashbuckling in a relatively low magic environment. How many things are more appealing than that type of setting? 

Everyone who’s a gamer has always wanted on some level to do a swashbuckling adventure, if for no reason other than to just have an excuse to talk like a pirate.

And because I watched the trilogy again partially as a point of research for my setting, I was taking note of various things that struck me as game mechanics. For example, in the first movie the characters are approximately 6^th or 7^th level DnD characters by the time they start recruiting a crew for the interceptor. 

I say that range because Jack clearly has the Leadership feat with Mr. Gibbs as his cohort and the usual named subjects. Jack is a Rogue/Swashbuckler, Barbosa is a Swashbuckler/Legendary Captain with maybe another prestige class, and Will is a Fighter with a level or two of Swashbuckler. I would try to speculate Elizabeth’s classes out but I don’t want to because after the first movie her character just bothers me too much to want to think about it.

The trilogy has probably the best example set I’ve ever seen for how the Leadership feat can/is supposed to work. Jack is always trying to find followers and hirelings to crew his ship, but only his trusted cohort and higher level crew members survive everything. It’s plenty hard for him trying to recruit new people and it takes time to do so. The 1^st level extras that he recruits are pretty much useful only for taking hits and crewing the ship. It’s probably the best cinematic example of the feat in existence.

I really like the way combat is done in these movies too. There’s just something wonderful when you’re seeing ship to ship combat during the age of sail. Something indescribably satisfying about it. It’s something that I have had such a massive desire to participate in no matter the style of it. I’ve played quite a few styles of this type of combat. 

Everything ranging from the various video games (which there hasn’t been a good one that is truly satisfying in ages, best I’ve got right now are the Total War series) to the Pirates collectible miniatures game (Which I loved, it’s modeled after CCGs though so it got expensive fast and next to no one played it). I want to play an RPG in that world, but no one really made a setting or supplement that I was satisfied with. They were always too high magic for my taste, it really distracted from the themes of the age of sail.

[An aside: This excites me now: Assassins' Creed 3 Shipboard Gameplay I want a game entirely built around this!!! Seriously, please. I have money and organs, what will it take?]

I want the feel of the age of sail without the stupid magic system killing off the things I love about the time period. That’s why I’ve never been able to play in a DnD style setting like that. Have any of you read through the Stormwrack book? Any ship that has a crew of a dozen or more is going to have a ship’s mage. The mages can absolutely wreck anything they come across. 

DnD also has very poor rules regarding black powder cannons and such because they didn’t design the rules around that type of technology level. On top of that the vehicle rules are rough and clumsy. The alternate Narrative Style of vehicle combat is interesting and may work better, but not everyone knows how those rules work.

I’m having to design almost everything from scratch on this. Anything not covered by a book I’m having to hunt down or build a stat for. I’m going through my historical references and creating ships and their stats based on that. I’m having to stat out weaponry and ship armor along with trying to get it to be compatible and enjoyable with the system. It’s a rough and slow process. It’s also frustrating sometimes.

There I go, getting distracted by a random tangent again. The point is, I want the game to feel like the good parts of those movies and the system isn’t setup for it so I’m looking for solutions. I’m positive that using the Narrative Naval Combat system for battle with custom ships and weapons for the setting will work and bring together the right feel for the combat that you’d see in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, but it requires careful research and balancing so that I don’t accidentally make a 6-gun sloop capable of leveling a 44-gun frigate with little effort.

It's fun to stat out these ships though. It let's me put my knowledge of history, warfare, and gaming into the same effort and enjoy myself while doing so. There's something nice about being able to let my creativity fly freely like this. 

We’ll see how it goes. I'm enjoying the creation process for the most part but that doesn't mean everyone is going to like the results. Here’s to hoping I don’t screw it up too badly!

Again with the anti-magic posts

Yeah, I know, I'm obsessed with this new toy I've been dreaming up for my campaign. Ever since writing up that last post regarding it I've been talking with whoever will listen and running options through my head of what I can do with it.

It looks like I'm starting to get the final form of it together though. I'm going to bounce the ideas off of some trusted sources and then I'll post the final form up here.

Dear god, I'm going to end up with most of a campaign book by the time I'm ready to run this thing...
Some very good ideas have been brought to my attention regarding replacment of magic weapons and items and a system needs to be developed for it, but it's a step in the right direction.

The setting needs more specifics added to it and posted for people to peruse. I don't want to fill in or create most of the specifics though so that the players can help shape the world to fit their visions of their origins.

I should also have a new description of the character creation information for this setting, which have changed from what I talked about earlier because I'm fickle and sometimes have far too much time on my hands.

Bounty Boards

Hooray, more stuff for this campaign I’ve been working on for way too long.

Over time I’ve been transitioning the original concept for this campaign from a very structured, traditional storyline into a more Mass Effect or Borderlands style almost sandbox progression. Due to a series of brainstorming sessions that popped up after finally getting to game again I’ve been contemplating turning the system into a more Elder Scrolls style of gameplay with a few hand rails to guide the players to the storyline.
This causes me an issue though. I like to make sure my encounters are well planned out in advance and appropriate to the setting/party. This obsession is what usually has caused my campaigns to break down into worthless heaps of garbage thrown together with a poor narrative structure. I don’t want that to happen anymore, but a sandbox style makes it far more difficult to maintain the level of organization I want for gaming sessions.

This dilemma has led me to think about it long and hard. The current game I get to play around in is a sandbox style campaign where we the players have completely derailed any of the plans the DM had in the beginning because we basically decided we would rather start our own feudal kingdom/colony. With that happening it makes it increasingly difficult for our DM to spontaneously create new content to set before us.
The DM does a good job at it, but we only play maybe once a month and take care of all of our Major role playing outside of the actual gaming sessions via email. (This game is really showing the great advantages of modern technology applied to tabletop gaming, which is making me hopeful for having a more robust gaming life again. More about that another time though.) My problem is that if I tried to do what he’s doing I know I’d be lazy and screw it up for my players if I didn’t plan it out. No one wants that. So I’ve figured out a few ways to get around this inherent lazy streak I have by developing a Bounty Board system that allows me to randomly generate encounters appropriate for the PCs. Add it in with the concept of the “Five Room Dungeon” (5RD) and you can infinitely generate new adventures for players on the fly with minimal effort expended.

I’m still working on the percentile charts for this but that’s the easy part of the system. The challenge is coming up with a way to generate these things while maintaining variety and not creating the same problems introduced by the core system’s random encounters tables (can you guess how I feel about DnD’s random encounters system? I’m known to whine about these types of things), namely the chance that you’ll make something out of character for the game you’re running. Either the encounter will be wildly outside of your ideal challenge rating, you’ll see something that doesn’t fit with your flavor showing up, or you’ll end up with things that just don’t feel right being shoehorned into your game.

For some people that works, but I don’t like it personally. So I worked out a way to randomly create missions for a bounty board type system for any new area that you would end up in. You start off with a randomly generated encounter level ranging from two levels below to two levels above current average party level. That’s easy enough to give you an idea of what you should be seeing the party fighting against. This of course will also help you more easily generate rewards appropriate for the encounter.

The next step is to determine the type of quest/bounty you’re after. Since this is a generic bounty board type quest I can be lazy with the general category of the quest you will be going after. In addition to storyline missions being on these boards there will also be randomly generated quests in the following categories; Monster (Notorious), Monster (group), NPC (Individual), NPC (Group), Fetch/Rescue, Escort.

Each of these quests is pretty straight forward in how they’re going to play out for the PCs, but I’ll lay them out below for clarity.

The Monster (Notorious) category will have an individual monster of some type that is either a bigger/meaner version of a local beasty (like an advanced Dire wolf, a vampire gorilla, or gargantuan spider, something you’d normally encounter, but advanced per the rules or that has a template applied) or a big unique monster that isn’t normally encountered in an area (like a Hydra, or a Medusa. Some type of mythical and mean thing that will give the players a challenge outside of the norm).

The Monster (Group) category will have the PCs hunting down a group/collection of monsters that are harassing an area. Pretty standard MMORPG fare at this point (kill these 10 gnolls/spiders/were-dire wombat ettins). Kill the monsters and/or remove their nest/base of operations. The monsters will be common ones for the area.

The NPC (Individual) is your typical bounty hunter operation. You hunt down a criminal or whatever using their wanted poster. They’ll usually have a small entourage but most of the EL rating is from the NPC you’re hunting. The character will be a PC class to ensure maximum challenge level.

The NPC (Group) is going to be NPC/PC classes acting as brigands or something similar.

Fetch/Rescue quests will be hunting down items from the nearby area or rescuing people who’ve been kidnapped.

Escort quests aren’t going to be your video game ones with retarded NPCs walking face first into enemy bullets. These are going to be some type of convoy or NPC escort into an nearby area where you’re either going to be fighting off waves of enemies or you’ll be ambushed along the way.

As I mentioned before I will be using the 5RD format for these bounty board quests. For those unfamiliar with the concept, a 5RD is a formula for making easy to run adventures that are likely to engage every member of your Player’s party. They consist of 5 “Rooms” (duh) that each have their own unique, single challenge for the characters to deal with. I use “rooms” in quotes because this isn’t about literally making a typical dungeon with only 5 rooms all in a row. Each room is just a concept for a new area with a single challenge in it. It could be those 5 literal rooms or it could be 5 different parts to a chase scene.

Room 1 is the entrance/guardian. You can make it a puzzle, a skill check of some type, or a combat encounter. Room 2 is a puzzle or Role Playing challenge. Room 3 is a trick and/or set back. Room 4 is the climax/big battle. Room 5 is the reward/revelation/twist.

So using a dungeon, you could have a Puzzle Door or a minotaur for room 1. Room 2 could be a statue on a floor switch type puzzle or an enchanted statue that requires you to solve a riddle to proceed. Room 3 could be the dungeon’s boss monster causing a cave-in that the players have to figure a way around. Room 4 would be facing the boss down while his minions swarm you. Room 5 would be raiding their hoard after finishing them all off.

Using the Chase example, room 1 would be encountering the fugitive you’re after and tracking him to the outskirts of the city you’re in. Room 2 would be convincing an NPC to point you in the direction they saw him go. Room 3 could be the NPC giving you bad info and leading you into an ambush, or the fugitive crossing a river and severing the only ferry across. Room 4 capture of the fugitive, whom you have to not kill. Room 5 would be bringing him back to the city for your reward.

So the things you can do with the 5RD are very diverse, but they allow you to use the format to give your players a very diverse set of challenges for a session without much extra effort. This makes them perfect for dealing with a random quest format like what I’m developing. The first 3 rooms also have the advantage of being interchangeable to fit with your particular format/feel in case you think something flows better when done in a different order than the standard format.

The challenge here is to make a random generation table for these 5RD formats that will allow for diverse options that reduce the chance of running the same things regularly. I think I’ll develop a table for each room type with sub tables for each condition. I’m not sure on the specifics, but that might be the best way. That’s if I even need to use a random content generator for these. Who knows, maybe the basics will be inspiring enough on their own.

Hopefully this entry isn’t as rambling as I think it is and you can make heads and tails of it. Let me know what you think. I need input otherwise I’m just in an echo chamber of my own self crapulence where all of my ideas are perfect. Which is a great world to live in until you try to actually apply it to reality.

List of things I'm working on

Okay, so here's what I have planned for the near future or have been working on since my son was born that I plan on putting up here later.

-A random Bounty Board quest generator for my campaign setting
-A summary of my feelings on the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy (and maybe the 4th movie as well if that comes in anytime soon) and how it has partially influenced my campaign setting
-More possible alterations to the campaign setting due to me overthinking things
-Ranting about Assassins' Creed 3
-GURPS conversion of Ray Stantz of Ghostbusters for an upcoming GURPS one shot adventure
-Talk of things I liked and didn't like about some other campaigns I've been in
-More character profiles (eventually)
-Maybe I'll even actually finish a short story or two

I think I've got more topics

More on that Sanity system...

So I think I'm close to figuring out what I want to do for the Sanity system as a limit for casters in my world. I've worked out some things over the course of a few weeks, run some numbers and started checking against my pre-made storyline encounters (which are kind of difficult encounters, so that was important to do). I have come across a few issues with what I feel are the two best options for the Sanity casting system when applied directly to some of the encounters and with some of the things that need to be done by antagonists later in the story, so it makes both of the options require tweaking of some major battles. Which of course means more work and rebalancing.

So, for those of you who don't want to read the other entry (which you can read here) I'll summarize the best I can. Due to how I feel about the DnD magic system and what level of magic I want in my world I want to come up with some way to limit spell casting to keep it a low-magic world. I want there to be a reason why casters don't use much magic to solve the world's problems but they do need to exist in order for some of the plot points and objects/areas/etc to exist. So I needed to develop something that could explain it.

I came across the Sanity system, typically used in a Call of Cthulhu-type setting, in Unearthed Arcana and decided I was going to adapt it to spellcasting in my setting. The basics are that each caster has a sanity score based off of their Wisdom score (Wisdom x 5 = Sanity). When a caster casts a spell they take sanity damage due to the nature of the energies they're channeling through their body touching their mind/being/soul/whatever. the amount of damage is dependent upon spell level, with higher level spells taking heavier tolls. Whenever a character loses 1/2 of their wisdom score in sanity points they have to make a sanity check or be stricken with a temporary insanity. The sanity check consists of rolling d% based upon you current sanity score. If your sanity score ever reaches 0 your character goes catatonic until they've recovered a significant portion (I added this because the real system doesn't let you come back, still working on the specific number). I'm also still debating whether or not to allow the PC to take a point of Taint instead of a temporary insanity, but only because I haven't decided if Taint is going to be used in the setting.

So with that fresh in your mind I want to talk about the two systems I'm throwing back and forth and comparing to each other. I'm having trouble picking between the two because I like aspects of both but both bring their own set of issues to the table.

System #1: Low Loss

In this system the spell casters take a sanity loss of 1 point per Spell Level (1/2 Point per 2 0-level spells). When a character loses the cumulative equivalent of 1/2 of their Wisdom score in Sanity they must make a Sanity check. There is no resistance against these losses and the check is only made once per sanity loss (no matter if it's only 1 point or it was 30 points that puts you over the 1/2 wisdom total  you only roll once for the loss that put you over). Recovery of sanity points is at the rate of 1D8 per Caster Level per day.

With this system I will also allow casters to be able to cast extra spells if they want to take a risk of going nuts. A spell caster can cast an extra spell from their known spells (even unprepared ones) by taking sanity loss equal to 1D6 per Spell Level followed by an immediate sanity check after the spell is cast. (This ability might get limited to a number of times per day equal to Caster Level for balancing, but then again maybe not. The drawback is pretty rough.)

The good thing with this is that it doesn't mean I need to adjust too much in the campaign world and still allows players flexibility with their class picks. I don't have to do the terrible thing as a DM with a low magic setting and have the enemies able to use more magic than the Players, which is always a big no-no. Spellcasters can still make it through the five minute workday without too much of a problem, maybe only getting hung up once or twice.

The bad thing I see with this kind of makes the magic level higher than I want it. It's still not a big enough deterrent to affect the way people do business in the world that most of the problems I want to avoid with high magic. Although it at least establishes a legitimate reason for non-casters to wary of magic.

System #2: Extreme Loss

This system uses similar mechanics as the other one. The major difference is in the amount of sanity lost. The sanity loss is 1D6 per Spell Level (1D3 per 0-level spell). At this level of loss I think each caster will be allowed an inherent resistance vs taint equal to their Wisdom Modifier and maybe more with feats, class features, and such (maybe various fractions of Caster Level, allowing will saves to reduce the amount lost, or something). The recovery rate per day would also increase to 1D8 + Wisdom Modifier per Caster Level per day.

I like this one because it puts spellcasting into the realm of rare, special, and dangerous.That's where I want magic to be. Those who master it are legends in their own right, but the journey is dangerous and prone to spectacular failure of the will of the mage. This turns everything magical into a liability on some level.

Both good and bad, this limits pure spell casters from existing as PCs because each spell cast is a major liability for the players. You potentially have people who will go crazy two rounds into the fight on a regular basis even with the resistances.

The bad things are that I have to redesign some encounters that were made based upon normal DnD rules and make sure they aren't accidentally too powerful with this setup. Some of the encounters are easy to fix, I just eliminate a spell caster or two from the mob roster. The problematic ones are at the higher levels or during special story encounters that make it difficult to judge the true difficulty of the encounter without magic in the party. Things like Hydras just got far more deadly once your players are only armed with torches and alchemist fire. (Which I'm totally okay with, I like that idea but it requires careful balancing)

I also need to be careful with how I design story elements. Some geographic features of the world and some elements of the story revolve around rituals and other such things of a magical nature that to deny magic to the player when there is magic that exists with such power that these objects or locations exists seems cruel and could take away from the players' enjoyment. There are good fluff reasons why these things could exist and why magic is so difficult and everything, but that doesn't mean a player will appreciate it, especially if they love playing a caster.

There will probably be concessions for various things when either of these things are implemented. Maybe alchemy is rather effective and "magic" weapons can still exist. They'd be specially crafted by master artisans and possibly alchemically enhanced, or with alchemical devices inside to give them effects. You know, the start of steam punk elements for the world on the verge of an industrial revolution. (I think I like that a lot... Maybe I'll look into the Alchemist class more for this as I'm converting everything to Pathfinder.)

This is in addition to Resurrection magic being rare and only possible in specially dedicated location among  other minor alterations to the magic system (a couple spells removed here and other quick things). Healing potions being more plentiful, cheaper, and easier to craft (to pull healing duties away from the casters so they don't have to waste spells and sanity) along with other tweaks. All of this will eventually be put into some type of campaign guide/primer that will be given to the players.

Anyways, as always let me know what you think. I have been having fun designing this thing. Working on the campaign again so heavily has gotten my creative juices flowing and I'm altering some other aspects and challenging some of my earlier thoughts on the campaign. I'll write more about my upcoming campaign related stuff later and give those interested an idea of what I have been developing during the temporary silence.

Deus Ex Human Revolution

So I finished up Deus Ex Human Revolution over the weekend and figured that I'd write a little bit about it because I haven't touched the blog for a little while. The housing issues and waiting for my son to pop out have kind of made life a little stressful for us so I haven't really had time to write or work on anything fun (which, as usual, leads to massive amounts of political talk making its way onto Facebook and me trolling comment sections on my favorite news sites. All work and no play makes Epi a dull boy and what not).

I picked up the entire collection of Deus Ex on Steam during the Summer sale because I'm poor and don't get to buy new games at release anymore (the last new game I bought was Skyrim, and before that was Duke Nukem Forever. Screw you, don't judge me. I can talk about that tragedy later.) I technically already owned everything but DEHR but the deal was too good to pass up and Steam is easier to deal with than trying to fight the old compatibility war with those older games. I'm sick of wasting my time on those types of things, which was why I got out of PC gaming in the first place. That's a different story for another day though.

The point is I'm a big fan of the original game which makes me hate the second game and made me intrigued to play the third.

(Note: I got distracted from writing this entry from this point on due to my son being born, so suck it if you find this to be a little disjointed, well, more disjointed than usual.)

DEHR takes place in the past and is basically a prequel to the orginal game. The main character, Adam Jensen, is the head of security for one of the major manufacturers of augmentations. Though you provide your best efforts, you're unable to stop a group of augmented mercs from wrecking havoc at your company's HQ.

Along the way you are mortally wounded and following the incident you spend the next 6 months in various facilities being fitted with the very best tech the company can outfit you with. Following that recovery you're on a mission to find those responsible for the attack. At this point the game becomes a stealthy 3rd person cover/FPS action game with  RPG elements. As far as gameplay is concerned it is immensely enjoyable.
The action sequences are enjoyable and almost all of them can be.avoided. When you get into gun fights it can be really fun and enjoyable.

It does use the rechargeable health bar, but it isn't quite a COD super soldier serum. The FPS gameplay is accessible and effective and you also have a cover system that switches you to a 3rd person perspective that also let's you have extended fire fights. The amount of health you and your opponents have is pretty low (with the exception of boss fights which I'll get to) and lends a more realistic feel to the combat. Without upgrading Jensen's dermal armor plating a single shotgun blast in "normal" difficulty can wreck your day.
It makes for some intense fight scenes and encourages the use of stealth, ambushes, and cover to accomplish your goals.

The original game focused very heavily on the multiple ways you could complete objectives. It was perfect at the time it was released. The design team for DEHR tried their hardest it seems but they didn't quite make it to the high mark set by the original. That being said, they still made it more open-ended for completing objectives than most games these days do, even ones that supposedly give you choices. I found ways to get into every area in this game from most every conceivable direction and most of them there are multiple approaches.

The storyline is kind of predictable, but is enjoyable. The elements of what it means to be human and other themes of the first one are toned done in this and a vague exposition about at what cost is it for humanity to advance itself with technology. The answer to that question though is easily seen within the confines of the story, it is AWESOME to be augmented, why would you choose anything else?

The acting/scripting is enjoyable and doesn't distract from the gameplay. Jensen's voice seems kind of forced into a Bat-Bale style of brooding anti-hero stereotype, but it works for it. Like I said, the voice acting isn't distracting. Like all game voice acting though it can be somewhat cheesy and predictable.

The major flaw with the game though is in the boss fights. This has been mentioned in countless other articles about the game but is worth mention every time. It is a good example of why the industry should be moving away from these old tropes unless important for the gameplay/narrative. The boss fights can be very hard. The first one, where you have to fight a super soldier with a built in mini-gun in a small room takes an ass ton of tries and is frustrating as hell. It can stop your enjoyment of the game entirely right then and there. I didn't do what others had done and exploited the mechanics to my advantage, but I was sorely tempted to.

This was the only major beef I had with the game. Two of those fights were brutal slugfests that just broke up the feeling of the game. There was only one real way to defeat any of them and that was brute force. It ignored anything you had built your version of Jensen for and just stuck you in the middle of a fight you didn't want for no real reason. It was jarring to say the least.

Overall, I would say I highly enjoyed the game. It is a good hardcore experience. It is enjoyable, easily worth the investment of time and money. I want to see what this team does with the property in the future, they have shown some great potential in their design philosophy.